Winner

GPT-6 Sol Medium

Engineering · October 13, 2026 · Difficulty: Medium

Final combined results in supplied rank order. Tied ranks remain tied.
ResultRank 1GPT-6 Sol MediumRank 2GPT-6 Sol HighRank 3GPT-6 Astra LowRank 4GPT-6 Astra MediumRank 5Claude Haiku 5.5 LowRank 6GPT-6 Luna MediumRank 7Claude Sonnet 5.5 MediumRank 8Claude Opus 5.5 Medium
Combined score90.0389.9389.6989.6882.8276.9775.7975.73
Judge
Judge score /10090.0090.0090.0090.0084.0076.0076.5076.50
Correctness /1099998788
Coverage /1099999866
Evidence /1099998888
Actionability /1099999899
Time6.18 s7.63 s11.4 s11.42 s37.53 s3.5 s35.2 s37.11 s
Estimated USD$0.007168$0.007668$0.03771$0.03816N/A$0.0003165N/AN/A

Supplemental estimates use reviewed exact-route API-equivalent list-rate scenarios with cache ignored; recorded estimates retain their frozen rates. Cost remains excluded from this battle score. These estimates are not Codex subscription charges or billed USD.

Historical Claude CLI cache counters were not retained. Complete input and complete reference cost are unavailable.

Judge score uses recorded rubric metrics; final rank uses the combined score.

Component points and token usage
Final combined results in supplied rank order. Tied ranks remain tied.
ResultRank 1 GPT-6 Sol MediumRank 2 GPT-6 Sol HighRank 3 GPT-6 Astra LowRank 4 GPT-6 Astra MediumRank 5 Claude Haiku 5.5 LowRank 6 GPT-6 Luna MediumRank 7 Claude Sonnet 5.5 MediumRank 8 Claude Opus 5.5 Medium
Quality points85.263285.263285.263285.263279.57897272.473772.4737
Test points00000000
Speed points4.77174.66964.42274.42163.23794.97323.31723.252
Cost points00000000
Total input incl cache2,3542,3542,5862,586N/AN/AN/AN/A
Cache read (subset of input)0000N/AN/AN/AN/A
Cache write (subset of input)0000N/AN/AN/AN/A
Total output incl reasoning246296237246N/AN/AN/AN/A
Reasoning (subset of output)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Swipe, scroll or use Previous and More to compare configurations. Row labels stay visible.

Advanced results and scoring details

engineering · 2026-10-13T04:17:31.484Z · Prospective evaluation. Equal transport and native system conditions are unverified.

Applied weights: quality 94.7368%, tests 0%, speed 5.2632%, cost 0%.

Cost was omitted for every configuration in this cohort. Active weights were normalized uniformly. Displayed scores are rounded; pairwise outcomes use exact recorded fractions. Reference costs are estimates, not billed charges. Missing components follow the recorded assessment.

Pairwise results

  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs GPT-6 Luna Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs Claude Opus 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Low: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs GPT-6 Sol High: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Low: First configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Luna Medium: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Medium: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs Claude Opus 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Low: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Sol High: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Low: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Luna Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Medium: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Luna Medium vs Claude Opus 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Luna Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Low: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Luna Medium vs GPT-6 Sol High: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Luna Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Low: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Astra Medium vs Claude Opus 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Astra Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Low: First configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Astra Medium vs GPT-6 Sol High: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Astra Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Low: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Low: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Sol High: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Astra Low: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 Low vs GPT-6 Sol High: Second configuration wins
  • Claude Haiku 5.5 Low vs GPT-6 Astra Low: Second configuration wins
  • GPT-6 Sol High vs GPT-6 Astra Low: First configuration wins