| Result | Rank 1GPT-6 Sol Low | Rank 2Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium | Rank 3Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium | Rank 4Claude Opus 5.5 Medium | Rank 5GPT-6 Luna None | Rank 6GPT-6 Luna Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined score | 90.15 | 88.46 | 79.16 | 79.01 | 75.56 | 66.08 |
| Judge | ||||||
| Judge score /100 | 90.00 | 90.00 | 80.00 | 80.00 | 74.50 | 64.50 |
| Correctness /10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| Coverage /10 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Evidence /10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 7 |
| Actionability /10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| Time | 4.63 s | 38.82 s | 33.68 s | 37.94 s | 3.38 s | 3.42 s |
| Estimated USD | $0.006666 | N/A | N/A | N/A | $0.0003529 | $0.0003569 |
Supplemental estimates use reviewed exact-route API-equivalent list-rate scenarios with cache ignored; recorded estimates retain their frozen rates. Cost remains excluded from this battle score. These estimates are not Codex subscription charges or billed USD.
Historical Claude CLI cache counters were not retained. Complete input and complete reference cost are unavailable.
Judge score uses recorded rubric metrics; final rank uses the combined score.
Component points and token usage
| Result | Rank 1 GPT-6 Sol Low | Rank 2 Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium | Rank 3 Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium | Rank 4 Claude Opus 5.5 Medium | Rank 5 GPT-6 Luna None | Rank 6 GPT-6 Luna Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality points | 85.2632 | 85.2632 | 75.7895 | 75.7895 | 70.5789 | 61.1053 |
| Test points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Speed points | 4.886 | 3.1955 | 3.371 | 3.2242 | 4.9828 | 4.9794 |
| Cost points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total input incl cache | 2,413 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Cache read (subset of input) | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Cache write (subset of input) | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total output incl reasoning | 184 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Reasoning (subset of output) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Swipe, scroll or use Previous and More to compare configurations. Row labels stay visible.
Advanced results and scoring details
data · 2026-10-13T05:13:26.635Z · Prospective evaluation. Equal transport and native system conditions are unverified.
Applied weights: quality 94.7368%, tests 0%, speed 5.2632%, cost 0%.
Cost was omitted for every configuration in this cohort. Active weights were normalized uniformly. Displayed scores are rounded; pairwise outcomes use exact recorded fractions. Reference costs are estimates, not billed charges. Missing components follow the recorded assessment.
Pairwise results
- GPT-6 Luna Low vs Claude Opus 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins
- GPT-6 Luna Low vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins
- GPT-6 Luna Low vs GPT-6 Sol Low: Second configuration wins
- GPT-6 Luna Low vs GPT-6 Luna None: Second configuration wins
- GPT-6 Luna Low vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins
- Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins
- Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Sol Low: Second configuration wins
- Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Luna None: First configuration wins
- Claude Opus 5.5 Medium vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins
- Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Sol Low: Second configuration wins
- Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium vs GPT-6 Luna None: First configuration wins
- Claude Haiku 5.5 Medium vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
- GPT-6 Sol Low vs GPT-6 Luna None: First configuration wins
- GPT-6 Sol Low vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: First configuration wins
- GPT-6 Luna None vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Medium: Second configuration wins